Frequency Inverter, AC Drive, Variable Speed Drive, Adjustable Speed Drive, Frequency Converter, VFD, VSD, Adjustable Frequency Drive, AFD, ASD, AC Motor Drive, Frequency Changers, Inverter, Biến tần, frequenzwandler, Azionamenti, Преобразователи частоты, приводов переменного тока, falowniki, frequentie regelaars, frequentieregelaars, convertisseur frequence, variateur frequence, Frequenzumrichter, convertitore frequenza, Inversores Frequência, ווסתי מהירות, محول تردد, اینورتر, Vectör Sürücüler
2012年10月26日星期五
Electrical VFD (Variable Frequency Drive) Application in a Pumping Plant Which Presently Spills Excess Pumpage
A. Pump Selection Criteria
1. The pump to automate with a VFD (in a location with multiple pumps supplying the same
pipeline) is the smallest which will meet both of the following criteria:
a. (Flow Rate of the VFD pump
+ Sum of the flow rates of all the smaller pumps)
must be greater than or equal to
(The flow rate of the next bigger pump)
ie, (QVFD + [sum of all Qsmaller pumps])>= QNext bigger pump
b. No larger pump flow can exceed the combined flow of all pumps which are smaller than it
(including the VFD at full speed)
2. There is generally little or no energy savings associated with converting to VFD control for more
than one pump at an installation.
B. Estimation of a annual KW-HR savings for a VFD installation.
1. Estimating the maximum potential savings.
An estimate of savings requires an estimate of the historical amounts of spilled water. If, for
example, the spilled water is 5% of the total pumped water, then the maximum KW-Hr savings
can be:
Max. KW-Hr savings = .05 x Annual KW-Hr
If pumping amounts vary significantly from year to year, an average of 3 years of data should be
used.
The savings may be somewhat less than this (if the VFD operation puts the pump into a less
efficient operating range) or somewhat more than this (if the new controlled water level is lower
than the previous spill level). An examination of pump efficiencies may show the greatest
savings possible can be obtained by simply improving the efficiencies of existing pumps.
a. The following information is necessary in most cases:
- Monthly power bills or pump test data providing KW-Hr per Acre-Foot (AF) pumped for
each pump
- Monthly hours of operation per pump
- Monthly water deliveries (as opposed to pumped amounts)
Irrigation Training and Research Center (ITRC) – www.itrc.org
1
----------------------- Page 2-----------------------
Estimating the Payback Electrical VFD Application - Farm Energy Assistance Loan Program - CEC Nov. 1994
http://www.itrc.org/reports/vfd/vfdpayback.htm ITRC Report 94-002
- Pump test data, providing Acre-Feet (AF) pumped per hour of operation for each pump
b. Compute AF pumped per month for each pump
AF
AF = hour x Hours of operation
c. From district delivery records, determine the total AF delivered to users (plus seepage and
conveyance losses) supplied by the pumping station, by month
d. Sum the monthly totals
e. For each water year, find the % spilled
AF Pumped - AF Delivered
% Spilled = x 100
AF Pumped
f. Compute the total KW-Hr savings possible
% Spilled
Annual KW-Hr savings possible = 100 x (Annual KW-Hr consumed)
2. Estimating KW-Hr which would have been consumed if one of the pumps had been converted to
VFD.
This second step should serve as a check on the first step, in which the "possible" savings were
computed. By doing this computation, the effect of the overall pump efficiency of the selected
VFD-controlled pump is accounted for.
Again, use historical data to make these "what-if" computations.
a. Estimate the AF which will be pumped by the VFD unit
(Hours) x GPM
AF =
5428
where
Hours = The total hours per year that water is delivered from the pump station
(the VFD will operate continuously)
GPM = 67% of the maximum GPM of the pump with the VFD controller (the
actual percentage can be determined with a detailed analysis, but it is
probably not warranted. The 67% provides a weighted average for a typical
condition, accounting for the KW-Hr consumed at various flow rates)
b. Estimate the annual KW-Hrs which would be used by the VFD
GPM x TDH x 0.0188 x Hours
Kw-HrsVFD = Efficiency/100
where
TDH = The total dynamic head of the pump, in feet.
Efficiency = The total efficiency of the pump (generally in the range of 40 - 70),
which depends upon:
Irrigation Training and Research Center (ITRC) – www.itrc.org
2
----------------------- Page 3-----------------------
Estimating the Payback Electrical VFD Application - Farm Energy Assistance Loan Program - CEC Nov. 1994
http://www.itrc.org/reports/vfd/vfdpayback.htm ITRC Report 94-002
Panel Efficiency (Panel) -about 97
Motor Efficiency (Motor) - depends upon motor size and model;
typically somewhere between 85 - 93
Impeller Effiency (Impeller) - the efficiency of the impeller and bowls.
The Impeller Efficiency to use will occur at a flow rate of about
67% of the maximum flow rate
Losses (Losses) - a measure of the losses which occur due to bearings;
typically about 98 on a short lift.
Panel x Motor x Impeller x Losses
Efficiency = 106
c. Estimate the annual KW-Hrs used by the other pumps at the station.
1. Estimate the AF delivered by the other pumps
AFother = (Total AF delivered to users plus conv. losses) - AFVFD
2. Compute the average pump efficiency (Effother) for the other (non-VFD) pumps.
The information from individual pumps will come from a pump test. Ideally, the
average efficiency should be determined by taking a weighted average after
considering the KW and the Hours of each pump, as anticipated after the VFD is
installed. In practice, a simple average may be sufficient because the pumps with the
lowest KW will be cycled on and off more often than the larger pumps, so they will
have more hours of operation than the larger KW pumps.
3. Make the final KW-Hr computation for the other pumps
TDH x 102 x AFother
KW-Hrother = Effother
d. Find the total annual KW-Hrs to be used by all pumps
Total KW-Hr = KW-Hrother + Kw-HrsVFD
e. Compute the total KW-Hr savings possible
订阅:
博文评论 (Atom)
没有评论:
发表评论